SpendLedger

Los Angeles County

GCS-10639-S - RFSQ for Facility Ancillary Services Master Agreement (FASMA) - Closing: Continuous

Evaluate the scope, inspect historical evidence, and cost your response.

Read official solicitationSave to my bids & review documentsBack to results
Response date
2028-09-17
Work location
Confirm in solicitation
Set-aside
Confirm eligibility in solicitation

Original SpendLedger summary of supplied structured facts. Verify the source record using its reference. Observation is not proof of current availability or amendments. Source access and reuse permissions are separate; unresolved permissions require review.

1. Understand the work

Review the full solicitation and amendments for deliverables, qualifications, contract structure, and submission requirements.

Read SpendLedger’s original summary
A procurement record identifies Los Angeles County as the agency. Reference: 006Ql00000lfnZZIAY. Recorded category: Personal Services. Recorded due date: 2028-09-17 (time unverified).

Notice 232039. Snapshot observation time is not available in this feed.

2. Evaluate five historical contracts

Compare the work and financial evidence. Similar wording identifies research candidates; it does not establish equivalent scope or market pricing.

5 of 5 comparisons found.

  1. Comparison 1 · Contract

    Contract record 710:C2018315

    Texas A&M University System Administrative and General Offices

    Supplier: BROADDUS PLANNING LLC

    Shared scope: specific wording: master agreement. Historical evidence: master agreement. Scope similarity does not establish equivalent staffing, quantities or pricing.

    Original award
    Not provided
    Current contract value
    $0.00
    Reported spending
    Not provided
    Labor rates / hours
    Not provided
    Expenses / profit
    Not provided
    Award or registration
    2017-09-21
    Start / end
    Unknown / 2019-08-31

    Totals can include amendments, software, or multiple years. Obtain the pricing schedule before comparing hourly rates.

    Inspect source record

    Record 710:C2018315 · Observed 2026-10-18 17:34:13+00

  2. Comparison 2 · Contract

    Contract record 710:C2018317

    Texas A&M University System Administrative and General Offices

    Supplier: GFF

    Shared scope: specific wording: master agreement. Historical evidence: master agreement. Scope similarity does not establish equivalent staffing, quantities or pricing.

    Original award
    Not provided
    Current contract value
    $0.00
    Reported spending
    Not provided
    Labor rates / hours
    Not provided
    Expenses / profit
    Not provided
    Award or registration
    2017-09-22
    Start / end
    Unknown / 2019-08-31

    Totals can include amendments, software, or multiple years. Obtain the pricing schedule before comparing hourly rates.

    Inspect source record

    Record 710:C2018317 · Observed 2026-10-18 17:34:13+00

  3. Comparison 3 · Contract

    Contract record 710:C2018318

    Texas A&M University System Administrative and General Offices

    Supplier: GSR ANDRADE ARCHITECTS INC

    Shared scope: specific wording: master agreement. Historical evidence: master agreement. Scope similarity does not establish equivalent staffing, quantities or pricing.

    Original award
    Not provided
    Current contract value
    $0.00
    Reported spending
    Not provided
    Labor rates / hours
    Not provided
    Expenses / profit
    Not provided
    Award or registration
    2017-09-22
    Start / end
    Unknown / 2019-08-31

    Totals can include amendments, software, or multiple years. Obtain the pricing schedule before comparing hourly rates.

    Inspect source record

    Record 710:C2018318 · Observed 2026-10-18 17:34:13+00

  4. Comparison 4 · Contract

    Contract record 710:C2018319

    Texas A&M University System Administrative and General Offices

    Supplier: Pierce Goodwin Alexander & Linville, Inc.

    Shared scope: specific wording: master agreement. Historical evidence: master agreement. Scope similarity does not establish equivalent staffing, quantities or pricing.

    Original award
    Not provided
    Current contract value
    $0.00
    Reported spending
    Not provided
    Labor rates / hours
    Not provided
    Expenses / profit
    Not provided
    Award or registration
    2017-09-22
    Start / end
    Unknown / 2019-08-31

    Totals can include amendments, software, or multiple years. Obtain the pricing schedule before comparing hourly rates.

    Inspect source record

    Record 710:C2018319 · Observed 2026-10-18 17:34:13+00

  5. Comparison 5 · Contract

    Contract record 710:C2018450

    Texas A&M University System Administrative and General Offices

    Supplier: WKMC ARCHITECTS INC

    Shared scope: specific wording: master agreement. Historical evidence: master agreement. Scope similarity does not establish equivalent staffing, quantities or pricing.

    Original award
    Not provided
    Current contract value
    $0.00
    Reported spending
    Not provided
    Labor rates / hours
    Not provided
    Expenses / profit
    Not provided
    Award or registration
    2017-09-22
    Start / end
    Unknown / 2019-08-31

    Totals can include amendments, software, or multiple years. Obtain the pricing schedule before comparing hourly rates.

    Inspect source record

    Record 710:C2018450 · Observed 2026-10-18 17:34:13+00

What winning awards tell us about price

A defensible bid range is not available yet. 0 of the required 5 awards have the scope, quantities, terms and price evidence needed for a normalized comparison.

No verified original award amounts are available in these comparisons. Current contract values, ceilings, and spending are not substituted for winning prices.

Evidence needed to produce a suggested range
  • Winning award price and date, with the pricing schedule.
  • Comparable deliverables, contract terms, location, and duration.
  • Quantities or units that support a like-for-like calculation.

Similar wording alone does not establish equivalent work. The cost model below remains useful while these facts are missing.

Related active procurements

Finding related current procurements…

Federal award evidence

Search USAspending for historical federal contracts using a work phrase from any sector. These are keyword candidates, not matched comparables or unit-price estimates.

Sign in to run a lookup. Nothing is requested until you select the button. Up to 20 awards and five detail lookups per request.

Enter a public work phrase, such as bridge construction, office cleaning or software maintenance. Your phrase is sent to USAspending; do not include private information.

Use ordered dates from October 1, 2007 through today. This window selects new awards; amounts are current cumulative totals.

No federal lookup requested.

3. Build your recommended bid

Enter the resources needed for your proposed scope. This recommendation uses your costs and target margin. Historical totals above are research context and are not automatically treated as competing prices.

Build your cost-based bid

This recommendation uses your costs and target margin. It is not a market-validated bid and includes no competitor rates or win probabilities. All amounts are USD.

Overhead applies to labor + expenses. Contingency applies after overhead. Price = total cost ÷ (1 − margin). Avoid counting overhead already included in loaded hourly cost.

Labor
Expenses

Enter every percentage, including 0. Maximum: 100 rows per section, 1,000,000 hours or hourly cost, $100,000,000 per expense, 1,000% overhead or contingency, 99.99% margin, and $1 billion recommended price. Up to two decimals per numeric input.

Enter your costs to calculate a recommendation. No estimate yet.

Draft is not saved. Drafts are visible to others using this browser profile.

Continue to requirements & proposal workspace